For intention, against media
Hope against a fatal disease
"However innocuous they might seem, habits in thought, word, and deed are the anchor of the
personality. The magician aims to pull up that anchor and cast himself free on the seas of chaos."
There is today a great dearth of intention, of thinking.
Not that there is a dearth of education or higher learning, there is plenty of availability of that
(leaving aside the trouble of equitable access), or even reasoning, but I speak rather of the
thinking in the day to day, when making a decision to, for example, walk to the fridge in the
evening to open it to find nothing of interest, knowing beforehand of course that there was not
going to be anything of interest. And in the decision then to wander without intention from that
fridge to something unrelated, hunger unsated, as there was no hunger. The fridge and the falsely
promised eating, consumption, was never an eating with the purpose of sating hunger, or even for the
pure joy of eating, it was an eating borne out of absence. An absence of intention, an absence of
knowing what to do, an absence of true action.
This absence is prevalent. It has seized our collective psyche and frozen our thinking and our
ability to generate intention. While with the empty meander to the fridge the lack of intention is
stark, the most common example, and perhaps a great source of this absence's prevalence, is the
internet and the consumption of media. Who has been at their laptop and for lack of knowing what
action to take, without even thinking about it, has opened Facebook or Reddit to "browse"? Or in a
moment of calmness and solitude, such as while sitting on the toilet, opened their phone to fill
that gap in their consumption, that gap in their unthinking? I have and I suspect the same for you
and many
others.
In modern America, the wine flows like water and the propaganda flows like wine. When one brings
themselves out of the stupor that is media consumption, frees themself, even for a short time, from
the habit— the addiction— of internet use, it is easy to find oneself lost in the void
of time, that emptiness where one can choose to do anything but doesn't know what on Earth is
worth doing. It is the feeling of having been deprived of the need to think about what to do when
one could just scroll or watch a TV show and having to exercise that skill atrophied from disuse.
But if we are to be free, we must cast ourselves into that chaos of possibility. We must at each
moment choose for ourselves the actions we take.
In the 19th century, while religion still gripped the minds of many Marx could declare
religion and its historical character the opiate of the masses. Today it has become the
internet. And in the way that history repeats itself, this mass internet addiction has taken on a
fervour of a religious character. In medieval Christendom, to call someone an atheist was to condemn
them. Today, when internet access has become widely accepted in United States as a human right
(even more so after the start of the pandemic when it became necessary for children to attend
school), and one is met with awkward stares and isolation (because it is a point of oddity, but also
because the internet has become the primary, when not the only, method of socialization used today)
if they do not engage with it (unless they are elderly, in which case they are excused from
participation in contemporary forms of socialization by relegation to their own, separate worlds:
the nursing home, gated retirement communities), it recalls the ostracization of the heretic.
But lest we wish to succumb the tyranny of social and mental control that is
the current incarnation of the internet and normalized media addiction, then we
must become heretical. Not just heretical, but fervently heretical. If the
corporate teleology of technology is to be believed, it is the course of
history one fights against when one ceases to be chronically online. The world
is becoming more connected than ever before, they say. More connected however
at the expense of our autonomy and personhood. And if one is to go against that
foul reality, that reality written by those who profit from its acceptance, one
has to become heretical.
I would be remiss if left this without any practical advice, especially when I speak despite my
use of the indefinite third person from my own experience. I have published this online so clearly I
cannot and do not sever the internet entirely. The key is to be intentional with it. A lack
of intentionality in the actions I take, an absentness that falls easily into scrolling when there
is a phone or laptop in front of me, combined with the sapping of attention and the endless drip
of dopamine (mobile games are designed directly around exploiting this by placing the user in a loop
of play-game/dopamine-release, then an ad or then offering an in-app purchases, then repeat) are the root
of the internet's toxicity, and if I can learn to become fully intentional when interacting with the
internet then the rest becomes easier. This cannot be done in one step, nor without dedication. To
that end, I practice being intentional with the actions I take. If I am going to get a drink of
water, I think "I am thirsty, so I am going to get a drink of water." If I pull out my
phone out of habit, I try to think why and what I intend to do with it rather than reflexively
scroll. This is an ongoing process: one of weening off of my addictive behaviors and one of
consistent dedication toward forming positive habits, and a process that has been working for me,
and might not for all.
This is in part a confession and in part a plea: a world where we are controlled by technology and
the media we consume rather than the reverse is not the future I want, and I beg you to fight
against it, for your sake and our collective well being... I ask your pardon for pretentiously
presuming that you have succumb to the systems of control that have been meticulously and not
without purpose put in place to subjugate our free will, to make us into the batteries that power
the machine, and to make us politically engaged but confine that engagement to Twitter, Facebook and
their ilk, to the safety of inaction, to the safety of spewing empty discourse into a void of
blackness generating more empty discourse if not nothing. If I have erred in my presumption, I
apologize, so long as you do not presume yourself immune.
Long before March of 2020, there has been great viruses in our midst. And their fatal disease,
internet and media addiction, has claimed an uncountable number of hours, days, years, from the lives
of its victims. These viruses which exist in plenitude compete for your attention and clicks,
and evolve quickly to outpace each other. Our brains are not equipped to handle them, as can be
seen from the parasitic attachment of the digital to our lives. Quarantine, inoculate, and arm
yourself against them.
—Philoponus Bindle
Jan 20, 2022